Allstate Insurance Co. v. Smith

428 S.W.2d 807, 11 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 424, 1968 Tex. LEXIS 387
Texas Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1968·No. No. B-813·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner’s original motion for summary judgment was overruled. The case was then submitted to a jury on special issues. When the members of the jury were unable to agree, they were discharged and an order was entered on October 13, 1966, declaring a mistrial. Thereafter on January 23, 1967, petitioner filed an amended motion for summary judgment, which was granted. This judgment has been reversed and the cause remanded, because the Court of Civil Appeals concluded that the amended motion for summary judgment was not timely filed. It reasoned that a motion for summary judgment comes too late when filed after the moving party’s motion for instructed verdict has been overruled in the [808]*808course of a conventional trial. 423 S.W.2d 600.

We are not satisfied that the holding of the Court of Civil Appeals is sound. It is our opinion, however, that a material issue of fact is shown by the summary judgment proofs, and the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is therefore correct. The application for writ of error is accordingly Refused, No Reversible Error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allstate Insurance Co. v. Smith, 428 S.W.2d 807, 11 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 424, 1968 Tex. LEXIS 387 (Tex. 1968).

428 S.W.2d 807 (Allstate Insurance Co. v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hidalgo v. SURETY SAVINGS AND LOAN ASS'N
502 S.W.2d 220 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1973)
Blancas v. Blancas
495 S.W.2d 597 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1973)
Anderson v. Bormann
489 S.W.2d 945 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1973)
Allstate Insurance Company v. Smith
471 S.W.2d 620 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1971)