Allstate Insurance Co. v. QUINN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
This text of 784 F. Supp. 927 (Allstate Insurance Co. v. QUINN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO., Successor to Northbrook Excess & Surplus Insurance Company, Plaintiff,
v.
QUINN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., and Insurance Company of North America, Defendants.
United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.
John B. Connarton, Jr., Medverd, Connarton & Simmons, Boston, Mass., Michael G. Patrizio, Dowd & Dowd, Ltd., Chicago, Ill., for Allstate Ins. Co.
Paul R. Koepff, Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander & Ferdon, New York City, David B. Chaffin, Wickens, Hare, Koches & Brooks, Boston, Mass., for Ins. Co. of North America.
Anil Madan, Jon M. Nelson, Madan and Madan, P.C., Boston, Mass., Norman Golub, Sheft & Sweeney, New York City, for Nat. Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa.
ORDER
WOODLOCK, District Judge.
It is hereby ordered that the above action be dismissed, with prejudice, and that the April 27, 1989 Judgment and February 28, 1989 Memorandum and Order herein be vacated. 713 F.Supp. 35.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
784 F. Supp. 927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allstate-insurance-co-v-quinn-construction-company-mad-1990.