Allstate Insurance Co. v. Miller

Missouri Court of Appeals

Allstate Insurance Co. v. Miller

425 S.W.3d 146, 2014 WL 295608, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 89

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 28, 2014·No. No. WD 76224·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

Rondi Miller appeals the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Allstate Insurance Company, which sought a declaration that Allstate owed Miller $100,000, and no more, under her automobile policy’s underinsured motorists coverage. Miller argues that, because she paid two different premiums for underinsured motorists coverage on two different vehicles in a single policy, she should be entitled to recover up to the full limit of liability on each vehicle, for a total of $200,000. But because the policy expressly and unambiguously disallows stacking, Miller’s claim is without merit. The trial court’s entry of summary judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM:

Rondi Miller appeals the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Allstate Insurance Company, which sought a declaration that Allstate owed Miller $100,000, and no more, under her automobile policy’s underinsured motorists coverage. Miller argues that, because she paid two different premiums for underinsured motorists coverage on two different vehicles in a single policy, she should be entitled to recover up to the full limit of liability on each vehicle, for a total of $200,000. But because the policy expressly and unambiguously disallows stacking, Miller’s claim is without merit. The trial court’s entry of summary judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Allstate Insurance Co. v. Miller, 425 S.W.3d 146, 2014 WL 295608, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 89 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

425 S.W.3d 146 (Allstate Insurance Co. v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related