Allstate Insurance Co. v. Miller

Missouri Court of Appeals

Allstate Insurance Co. v. Miller

425 S.W.3d 146, 2014 WL 295608, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 89

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 28, 2014

DocketNo. WD 76224

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 425 S.W.3d 146 (Allstate Insurance Co. v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allstate Insurance Co. v. Miller, 425 S.W.3d 146, 2014 WL 295608, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 89 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

Rondi Miller appeals the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Allstate Insurance Company, which sought a declaration that Allstate owed Miller $100,000, and no more, under her automobile policy’s underinsured motorists coverage. Miller argues that, because she paid two different premiums for underinsured motorists coverage on two different vehicles in a single policy, she should be entitled to recover up to the full limit of liability on each vehicle, for a total of $200,000. But because the policy expressly and unambiguously disallows stacking, Miller’s claim is without merit. The trial court’s entry of summary judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM:

Rondi Miller appeals the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Allstate Insurance Company, which sought a declaration that Allstate owed Miller $100,000, and no more, under her automobile policy’s underinsured motorists coverage. Miller argues that, because she paid two different premiums for underinsured motorists coverage on two different vehicles in a single policy, she should be entitled to recover up to the full limit of liability on each vehicle, for a total of $200,000. But because the policy expressly and unambiguously disallows stacking, Miller’s claim is without merit. The trial court’s entry of summary judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

425 S.W.3d 146, 2014 WL 295608, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allstate-insurance-co-v-miller-moctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack