Allstate Insurance Co. v. Mashin

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Allstate Insurance Co. v. Mashin

564 So. 2d 264, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5397, 1990 WL 102691

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 24, 1990

DocketNo. 90-139

StatusPublished

This text of 564 So. 2d 264 (Allstate Insurance Co. v. Mashin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allstate Insurance Co. v. Mashin, 564 So. 2d 264, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5397, 1990 WL 102691 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

An uninsured motorist insurer seeks review of the grant of insureds’ motion to enforce a settlement without requiring the insureds’ group health insurer to be a co-payee on the settlement check. The enforcement of the settlement pursuant to the terms of the settlement precludes the inclusion of any health insurance carriers on the settlement draft. See Robbie v. City of Miami, 469 So.2d 1384 (Fla.1985). Accordingly, the trial court's decision is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

An uninsured motorist insurer seeks review of the grant of insureds’ motion to enforce a settlement without requiring the insureds’ group health insurer to be a co-payee on the settlement check. The enforcement of the settlement pursuant to the terms of the settlement precludes the inclusion of any health insurance carriers on the settlement draft. See Robbie v. City of Miami, 469 So.2d 1384 (Fla.1985). Accordingly, the trial court's decision is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

564 So. 2d 264, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5397, 1990 WL 102691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allstate-insurance-co-v-mashin-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack