Allstate Insurance Co. v. Inman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Allstate Insurance Co. v. Inman

753 So. 2d 117, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14920, 1999 WL 1024079

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 12, 1999

DocketNos. 99-170, 99-584

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 753 So. 2d 117 (Allstate Insurance Co. v. Inman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allstate Insurance Co. v. Inman, 753 So. 2d 117, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14920, 1999 WL 1024079 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

DAUKSCH, J.

• This is an appeal from a judgment in a personal injury case wherein appellant seeks a new trial because of the misbehavior of plaintiffs counsel during the trial.

Although we condemn in the strongest terms the objected-to comments of plaintiffs counsel in his closing arguments, we are of the opinion that it is not demonstrated that those comments affected the verdict of the jury. Because there were unobjected-to improper comments and we cannot say those comments in their combination and in combination with the objected-to comments did not affect the verdict, we inform counsel that we rely on Fravel v. Haughey, 727 So.2d 1033 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999) in making our decision.

The judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

HARRIS J., concurs. GRIFFIN, J., concurs specially in result only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAUKSCH, J.

• This is an appeal from a judgment in a personal injury case wherein appellant seeks a new trial because of the misbehavior of plaintiffs counsel during the trial.

Although we condemn in the strongest terms the objected-to comments of plaintiffs counsel in his closing arguments, we are of the opinion that it is not demonstrated that those comments affected the verdict of the jury. Because there were unobjected-to improper comments and we cannot say those comments in their combination and in combination with the objected-to comments did not affect the verdict, we inform counsel that we rely on Fravel v. Haughey, 727 So.2d 1033 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999) in making our decision.

The judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

HARRIS J., concurs. GRIFFIN, J., concurs specially in result only.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

753 So. 2d 117, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14920, 1999 WL 1024079, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allstate-insurance-co-v-inman-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack