Allstate Insurance Co. v. Inman

753 So. 2d 117, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14920, 1999 WL 1024079
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 12, 1999·No. Nos. 99-170, 99-584·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

DAUKSCH, J.

• This is an appeal from a judgment in a personal injury case wherein appellant seeks a new trial because of the misbehavior of plaintiffs counsel during the trial.

Although we condemn in the strongest terms the objected-to comments of plaintiffs counsel in his closing arguments, we are of the opinion that it is not demonstrated that those comments affected the verdict of the jury. Because there were unobjected-to improper comments and we cannot say those comments in their combination and in combination with the objected-to comments did not affect the verdict, we inform counsel that we rely on Fravel v. Haughey, 727 So.2d 1033 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999) in making our decision.

The judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

HARRIS J., concurs. GRIFFIN, J., concurs specially in result only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allstate Insurance Co. v. Inman, 753 So. 2d 117, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14920, 1999 WL 1024079 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

753 So. 2d 117 (Allstate Insurance Co. v. Inman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Griggs v. State
753 So. 2d 117 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)