Allstate Erectors, Inc. v. Halpern Building Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Allstate Erectors, Inc. v. Halpern Building Corp.

85 A.D.2d 588, 449 N.Y.S.2d 635, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16385

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 7, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 85 A.D.2d 588 (Allstate Erectors, Inc. v. Halpern Building Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allstate Erectors, Inc. v. Halpern Building Corp., 85 A.D.2d 588, 449 N.Y.S.2d 635, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16385 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract and to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, the cross appeals are from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rubenfeld, J.), entered November 21, 1980, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, awarded judgment in favor of plaintiff against certain of the defendants in the principal sum of $5,938 on the first and second causes of action. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The trial record reveals that the mechanic’s lien was timely filed under section 10 of the Lien Law (see Uprite Constr. Co. v Fisher, 74 AD2d 826). Furthermore, the amount awarded by the court on the two causes of action was proper. We find no merit to the other claims raised by the parites. Laser, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract and to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, the cross appeals are from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rubenfeld, J.), entered November 21, 1980, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, awarded judgment in favor of plaintiff against certain of the defendants in the principal sum of $5,938 on the first and second causes of action. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The trial record reveals that the mechanic’s lien was timely filed under section 10 of the Lien Law (see Uprite Constr. Co. v Fisher, 74 AD2d 826). Furthermore, the amount awarded by the court on the two causes of action was proper. We find no merit to the other claims raised by the parites. Laser, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 A.D.2d 588, 449 N.Y.S.2d 635, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allstate-erectors-inc-v-halpern-building-corp-nyappdiv-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack