Allred v. State

128 S.E. 818, 34 Ga. App. 231, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 177
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 29, 1925
Docket16578
StatusPublished

This text of 128 S.E. 818 (Allred v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allred v. State, 128 S.E. 818, 34 Ga. App. 231, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 177 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Beoyles, O. J.

The evidence tending to connect the accused with the offense charged was wholly circumstantial, and was insufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of his guilt. The court therefore erred in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ.} concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
128 S.E. 818, 34 Ga. App. 231, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allred-v-state-gactapp-1925.