Allred v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Allred v. State

115 So. 71, 22 Ala. App. 298, 1928 Ala. App. LEXIS 8

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 10, 1928

Docket6 Div. 254.

StatusPublished

This text of 115 So. 71 (Allred v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allred v. State, 115 So. 71, 22 Ala. App. 298, 1928 Ala. App. LEXIS 8 (Ala. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

It was error to allow the state’s witnesses Graves and McPherson to testify over the objection and exception of defendant that they did testify before the grand jury that one of the parties at the still was this defendant, but we have read the evidence, and from the entire record we are of the opinion that the substantial rights of the defendant were not affected thereby.

We find no prejudicial error in any ruling of the court, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

It was error to allow the state’s witnesses Graves and McPherson to testify over the objection and exception of defendant that they did testify before the grand jury that one of the parties at the still was this defendant, but we have read the evidence, and from the entire record we are of the opinion that the substantial rights of the defendant were not affected thereby.

We find no prejudicial error in any ruling of the court, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 So. 71, 22 Ala. App. 298, 1928 Ala. App. LEXIS 8, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allred-v-state-alactapp-1928.