Allred v. Robbins

205 N.C. 823
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 24, 1934·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This was an action to recover judgment upon certain promissory notes executed by the defendant Robbins and to set aside a conveyance of land executed by him and his wife to his codefendant. It is alleged that the conveyance constituted a fraud upon creditors.

The judgment overruling the demurrer is supported and warranted by the decisions in Chemical Co. v. Floyd, 158 N. C., 455, 74 S. E., 465, and Carswell v. Talley, 192 N. C., 37, 133 S. E., 181.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allred v. Robbins, 205 N.C. 823 (N.C. 1934).

205 N.C. 823 (Allred v. Robbins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. Floyd
74 S.E. 465 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1912)
Carswell v. . Talley
133 S.E. 181 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1926)