Allread v. Harris
This text of 1 Ga. L. Rep. 160 (Allread v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where a contract of sale was made, whereby the title was contracted to be sold, and a rescission was provided for in case of failure to pay the first installment, or if that and no other was paid, the more complete remedy, on failure to pay or return the property, was by bill in equity, rather than by a proceeding to dispossess a tenant holding over, although in the contract there was a stipulation for rent upon certain contingencies. 56 Ga., 316, 139, 578, 666, 670, 671; Code, §4077; 48 Ga., 60; 62 Id., 419 ; Code, §2279 ; 14 Ga., 131.
(a) In this case the defendant failed to pay or rescind, and on the making of an affidavit to dispossess him, he filed a counter affidavit.
(b) The verdict and decree were just and proper ; and such a decree will not be readily disturbed on the ground of objection to the forum, because there was a remedy at law, unless it be shown that as complete reli. f could have been granted at law for the entire rights of the complainants.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Ga. L. Rep. 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allread-v-harris-ga-1885.