Alloway v. Hickok

215 A.D. 86, 213 N.Y.S. 192, 1925 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5369
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 23, 1925
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 215 A.D. 86 (Alloway v. Hickok) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alloway v. Hickok, 215 A.D. 86, 213 N.Y.S. 192, 1925 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5369 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The action was to recover damages for unlawful and willful injury to plaintiff’s personal property. The complaint demanded judgment for treble damages pursuant to Penal Law, section 1433, subdivision 3. The evidence clearly brought the case within the provisions of the statute cited. The learned trial justice left it to the jury to assess the actual damage sustained by the plaintiff. This was the proper procedure. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 435.) The jury assessed such actual damage at $600. The Civil Practice Act directs that judgment shall be entered for the increased damage given by the Penal Law. But the learned justice denied plaintiff’s application that judgment be directed for the treble damages. We think that plaintiff had a right under the statute to enter judgment for treble damages. (Layton v. McConnell, 61 App. Div. 447.)

The order denying plaintiff’s motion to treble damages found by the jury should be reversed upon the law and the facts and the motion granted. The judgment appealed from should be modified so as to award treble damages to the plaintiff and as so modified said judgment should be affirmed, with costs to appellant.

Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Young, JJ., concur.

Order denying plaintiff’s motion to treble damages found by the jury, reversed upon the law and the facts, and motion granted. The judgment appealed from is modified so as to award treble damages to the plaintiff, and as so modified affirmed, with costs to appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kelsey v. Ellis
259 A.D. 1070 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)
Burton v. Myers
172 Misc. 263 (New York Supreme Court, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
215 A.D. 86, 213 N.Y.S. 192, 1925 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alloway-v-hickok-nyappdiv-1925.