Allou Health & Beauty Care, Inc. v. Syracuse Salon Distributors, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Allou Health & Beauty Care, Inc. v. Syracuse Salon Distributors, Inc.

226 A.D.2d 411, 640 N.Y.S.2d 785, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3557

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 8, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for an alleged breach of a sales contract, the defendant Syracuse Salon Distributors, Inc., appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Tanenbaum, J.), entered March 7, 1995, which, upon granting the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, is in favor of the plaintiff and against it in the amount of $64,965.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. After the plaintiff made out a prima facie showing of entitlement to summary judgment, the defendant Syracuse Salon Distributors, Inc. offered nothing but conclusory assertions and failed to present any genuine factual issues which would preclude summary relief (see, Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 NY2d 1065). Balletta, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for an alleged breach of a sales contract, the defendant Syracuse Salon Distributors, Inc., appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Tanenbaum, J.), entered March 7, 1995, which, upon granting the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, is in favor of the plaintiff and against it in the amount of $64,965.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. After the plaintiff made out a prima facie showing of entitlement to summary judgment, the defendant Syracuse Salon Distributors, Inc. offered nothing but conclusory assertions and failed to present any genuine factual issues which would preclude summary relief (see, Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 NY2d 1065). Balletta, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.

Allou Health & Beauty Care, Inc. v. Syracuse Salon Distributors, Inc., 226 A.D.2d 411, 640 N.Y.S.2d 785, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3557 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

226 A.D.2d 411 (Allou Health & Beauty Care, Inc. v. Syracuse Salon Distributors, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related