Allou Health & Beauty Care, Inc. v. Syracuse Salon Distributors, Inc.
This text of 226 A.D.2d 411 (Allou Health & Beauty Care, Inc. v. Syracuse Salon Distributors, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for an alleged breach of a sales contract, the defendant Syracuse Salon Distributors, Inc., appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Tanenbaum, J.), entered March 7, 1995, which, upon granting the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, is in favor of the plaintiff and against it in the amount of $64,965.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. After the plaintiff made out a prima facie showing of entitlement to summary judgment, the defendant Syracuse Salon Distributors, Inc. offered nothing but conclusory assertions and failed to present any genuine factual issues which would preclude summary relief (see, Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 NY2d 1065). Balletta, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
226 A.D.2d 411, 640 N.Y.S.2d 785, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allou-health-beauty-care-inc-v-syracuse-salon-distributors-inc-nyappdiv-1996.