Allord v. Henry Muhs Co.
168 A. 298, 111 N.J.L. 237, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 321
Opinion
The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion filed in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.
For reversal — Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Allord v. Henry Muhs Co., 168 A. 298, 111 N.J.L. 237, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 321 (N.J. 1933).
168 A. 298 (Allord v. Henry Muhs Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Barry v. Wallace J. Wilck, Inc.
167 A.2d 181 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)
Riccioni v. American Cyanamid Co.
96 A.2d 765 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)
Kenny v. Duro-Test Corporation
91 F. Supp. 633 (D. New Jersey, 1950)