Allongo v. Belaval
This text of 19 P.R. 1022 (Allongo v. Belaval) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Puerto Rico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
An action for damages was brought in the District Court of Ponce by Manuel Allongo Muñiz -against José Sastraño Belaval as Registrar of Property of Ponce, which he was at that time. The defendant demurred to the complaint and his demurrer was sustained by the court on July 22, 1913. Not being satisfied “with the judgment rendered,” the plaintiff appealed therefrom to this court.
The transcript of the record having been brought up and the hearing set for November 12,1913, the respondent "appeared and moved that the appeal be dismissed because the transcript of the record contained no copy of the judgment appealed from.
We have examined carefully the said transcript of the record and find that it contains only the ruling of the lower court sustaining the demurrer and ordering that judgment be entered dismissing the complaint with costs against the plaintiff. No copy of the judgment entered, if it were really entered, appears in the transcript of the record, and therefore the appeal from a judgment whose existence has not been proved must be dismissed according to law and jurisprudence. Sections 299 (amended by Act No. 70 of 1911), 233 and 303 of the Code of Civil Procedure and the cases of Jiménez v. Olmedo, 13 P. R. R., 296, and Hernández v. Hernández et al., ante p. 987, and López v. López, ante p. 990.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 P.R. 1022, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allongo-v-belaval-prsupreme-1913.