Allone v. University Hospital of New York University Medical Center

235 A.D.2d 447, 652 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 427
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 21, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 235 A.D.2d 447 (Allone v. University Hospital of New York University Medical Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allone v. University Hospital of New York University Medical Center, 235 A.D.2d 447, 652 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 427 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

In a medical malpractice action, the defendant Samuel Stone, M.D., P. C. appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Scholnick, J.), dated January 5, 1996, as denied its cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant Samuel Stone, M.D., P. C. (hereinafter Stone), contends that the court erred in denying its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it. While the appellant admits involvement in the medical care rendered to the infant plaintiff, it claims that its involvement was minimal. However, the record indicates that Stone was the general pediatrician for the infant plaintiff during the infant’s admission to the defendant hospital for the surgical management of a tumor. In opposition to the appellant’s motion the plaintiffs submitted the affirmation of a physician expert which set forth both his qualifications and the specific factors in the infant plaintiff’s medical records leading to his conclusion that the hospital’s pediatric group failed to diagnose the infant plaintiff’s ulcers. The plaintiffs’ expert, a neurologist, was qualified to render an opinion in the specialty of neurosurgery or pediatrics (see, Humphrey v Jewish Hosp. & Med. Ctr., 172 AD2d 494), and his affirmation was sufficient to defeat the appellant’s cross motion for summary judgment (see, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 326-327; Menzel v Plotnick, 202 AD2d 558; Somoza v St. Vincent’s Hosp. & Med. Ctr., 192 AD2d 429). Miller, J. P., Ritter, Sullivan, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Leavy v. Merriam
133 A.D.3d 636 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Ferris v. Millman
17 Misc. 3d 898 (New York Supreme Court, 2007)
Michael St. Aubrey v. Smithtown Pediatric Group, P.C.
31 A.D.3d 629 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Hranek v. United Methodist Homes of Wyoming Conference
27 A.D.3d 879 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Texter v. Middletown Dialysis Center, Inc.
22 A.D.3d 831 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Pearce v. Klein
293 A.D.2d 593 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Mineroff v. Silber
274 A.D.2d 379 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 A.D.2d 447, 652 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allone-v-university-hospital-of-new-york-university-medical-center-nyappdiv-1997.