Allmond v. State
Opinion
Steven D. ALLMOND, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Steven D. Allmond, pro se, Appellant.
Charlie Crist, Attorney General, and Sherri Tolar Rollison, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
In this timely appeal from the trial court's summary denial of appellant's Rule 3.800(a) postconviction motion, appellant raises three issues, two of which merit no discussion. Appellant's third claim, however, which is that his written sentence is illegal because the trial court failed to orally pronounce the imposition of a minimum mandatory 15 years' imprisonment for each count pursuant to section 775.084(4)(b)(1), Florida Statutes (1995), is facially sufficient. Accordingly, we remand this matter to the trial court for either the attachment of portions of the *1251 record conclusively refuting appellant's assertion or for the removal of the minimum mandatory portions of his sentence. See State v. Hudson, 698 So.2d 831 (Fla.1997); Hill v. State, 652 So.2d 904 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).
ALLEN, DAVIS, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
933 So. 2d 1250 (Allmond v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.