Allmond v. Section 8 Department of Housing
This text of 89 F. App'x 392 (Allmond v. Section 8 Department of Housing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Darryl Allmond appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. [393]*393See Allmond v. Section 8 Dep’t of Housing, No. CA-03-894 (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 25, 2003 & entered Sept. 30, 2003; Oet. 8, 2003). We also find that the district court properly denied Allmond’s motion for substitution and decided the case without oral argument. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 F. App'x 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allmond-v-section-8-department-of-housing-ca4-2004.