Allmon v. Crooks & Co.

97 A. 424, 29 Del. 159, 6 Boyce 159, 1916 Del. LEXIS 13
CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedJanuary 20, 1916
DocketNo. 111
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 97 A. 424 (Allmon v. Crooks & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allmon v. Crooks & Co., 97 A. 424, 29 Del. 159, 6 Boyce 159, 1916 Del. LEXIS 13 (Del. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Conrad, J.,

delivering the opinion of the court.

The defendant’s plea in this case alleges that plaintiff is not entitled to recover because, at the time of performing the services and furnishing the materials for which the suit is brought, the plaintiff had failed to obtain a license for carrying on the business or occupation of a plumber, as provided by the statute of this state. To this plea the plaintiff demurs.

The court is clearly of opinion that the case of Strout v. Howell, 4 Boyce 31, 85 Atl. 666, decided by the Supreme Court of this state in 1913, conclusively settles the law in the pending case. The Model Heating Company case turned upon another principle and can readily be reconciled with the Strout-Howell case.

We are fully satisfied, and so decide, that in Delaware a contract cannot be enforced by a party who has failed to obtain a license to do business, or carry on an occupation as provided by the statute of the state, if that defense is pleaded.

The demurrer is overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Circelli v. Braunstein
165 F. Supp. 168 (D. Delaware, 1958)
Mendolia v. Zakrzewski
22 A.2d 835 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 A. 424, 29 Del. 159, 6 Boyce 159, 1916 Del. LEXIS 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allmon-v-crooks-co-delsuperct-1916.