Allmark v. Platte S. S. Co.

76 F. 615, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2900
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York·Decided November 2, 1896·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

BENEDICT, District Judge.

This is a motion to set aside the service of the summons in a case removed to this court from a state court. It appears that, while the case was in the state court, the defendant made a motion to the1 state court to set aside the service, which was denied. Thereafter it removed the said case to this court, and, after its removal, now moves here to set aside the service, upon the same grounds urged in the state court. In my opinion, the defendant is concluded by the decision of the state court made upon its own request, before the cause was removed. This court takes the cause in the condition in which it was left by the state court. A. similar motion had been made in the state court and denied, and no leave was obtained in such court to renew it; nor was any leave obtained in this court. Brooks v. Farwell, 4 Fed. 166; Loomis v. Carrington, 18 Fed. 97. Motion to set aside the service of summons denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allmark v. Platte S. S. Co., 76 F. 615, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2900 (circtedny 1896).

76 F. 615 (Allmark v. Platte S. S. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nasso v. Seagal
263 F. Supp. 2d 596 (E.D. New York, 2003)
Dicks-David Co. v. Edward Maurer Co.
279 F. 281 (D. New Jersey, 1922)
Guernsey v. Cross
153 F. 827 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine, 1907)
Denison v. Shawmut Min. Co.
124 F. 860 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York, 1903)
Bragdon v. Perkins-Campbell Co.
82 F. 338 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania, 1897)