Allman v. Aldredge

18 S.E.2d 478, 193 Ga. 269, 1942 Ga. LEXIS 376
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Allman v. Aldredge. Read the opinion of the Court — 192 Ga. 431
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 13, 1942·No. 13948.·Published

Opinion

Reij>, Chief Justice.

This court having held, in a habeas-eorpus proceeding brought by the plaintiff, that her conditional pardon never became effective, for the reason that she did not, as a matter of law, tender the sum upon the payment of which the pardon was conditioned, within a reasonable time, and that the judge of the court in which she was convicted was authorized to issue a warrant for her arrest for the service of her sentence (Allman v. Aldredge, 192 Ga. 431, 15 S. E. 2d, 710), this is conclusive of the present petition for mandamus to compel the sheriff to accept payment of the money tendered after issuance of the warrant, which raises the same questions adjudicated in the habeaseorpus proceeding. Code, § 110-501.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. *270 John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, Bond Almand, W. S. North cutt, E. H. Bheais, Spalding, Sibley, Troutman & Brock, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allman v. Aldredge, 18 S.E.2d 478, 193 Ga. 269, 1942 Ga. LEXIS 376 (Ga. 1942).

18 S.E.2d 478 (Allman v. Aldredge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Allman v. Aldredge
15 S.E.2d 710 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)