Allison v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Allison v. Thomas

92 S.E. 1011, 20 Ga. App. 255, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 848

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 15, 1917·No. 8203·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

"G-eokge, J.

1. When a party contracts for property of a specific kind and character, and property of a different kind and character is tendered, the party may treat the contract as at an end and have his action for the recovery of such part of the purchase price as he may have paid at the time of the making, of the contract. In such ease he is not required to accept the property and sue for a breach of the contract.

2. The evidence, while weak, was sufficient to support the verdict. Accordingly, the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, 0. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

"G-eokge, J.

1. When a party contracts for property of a specific kind and character, and property of a different kind and character is tendered, the party may treat the contract as at an end and have his action for the recovery of such part of the purchase price as he may have paid at the time of the making, of the contract. In such ease he is not required to accept the property and sue for a breach of the contract.

2. The evidence, while weak, was sufficient to support the verdict. Accordingly, the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, 0. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Allison v. Thomas, 92 S.E. 1011, 20 Ga. App. 255, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 848 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

92 S.E. 1011 (Allison v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related