Allison v. Thomas

92 S.E. 1011, 20 Ga. App. 255, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 848
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 15, 1917
Docket8203
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 92 S.E. 1011 (Allison v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allison v. Thomas, 92 S.E. 1011, 20 Ga. App. 255, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 848 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

"G-eokge, J.

1. When a party contracts for property of a specific kind and character, and property of a different kind and character is tendered, the party may treat the contract as at an end and have his action for the recovery of such part of the purchase price as he may have paid at the time of the making, of the contract. In such ease he is not required to accept the property and sue for a breach of the contract.

2. The evidence, while weak, was sufficient to support the verdict. Accordingly, the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, 0. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

RAYMOND ROWE FURNITURE COMPANY v. Simms
65 S.E.2d 830 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 S.E. 1011, 20 Ga. App. 255, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allison-v-thomas-gactapp-1917.