Allison v. Texas

295 U.S. 717, 55 S. Ct. 828
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 13, 1935·No. No. 704·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed (1) for the reason that the judgment of the state court sought to be reviewed is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it, Stone v. State, 48 Tex. Cr. 114; 86 S. W. 1029; Farson Son & Co. v. Bird, 248 U. S. 268, 271; Doyle v. Atwell, 261 U. S. 590, McCoy v. Shaw, 277 U. S. 302, and (2) for the want of a substantial federal question, Watson v. Maryland, 218 U. S. 173, 175-180; Crane v. Johnson, 242 U. S. 339, 342-344; McNaughton v. Johnson, 242 U. S. 344, 348-349; Graves v. Minnesota, 272 U. S. 425; Hurwitz v. North, 271 U. S. 40, 43.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allison v. Texas, 295 U.S. 717, 55 S. Ct. 828 (1935).

295 U.S. 717 (Allison v. Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Watson v. Maryland
218 U.S. 173 (Supreme Court, 1910)
Crane v. Johnson
242 U.S. 339 (Supreme Court, 1917)
McNaughton v. Johnson
242 U.S. 344 (Supreme Court, 1917)
Farson, Son & Co. v. Bird
248 U.S. 268 (Supreme Court, 1919)
New York Ex Rel. Doyle v. Atwell
261 U.S. 590 (Supreme Court, 1923)
Missouri Ex Rel. Hurwitz v. North
271 U.S. 40 (Supreme Court, 1926)
Graves v. Minnesota
272 U.S. 425 (Supreme Court, 1926)
McCoy v. Shaw
277 U.S. 302 (Supreme Court, 1928)
Stone v. State
86 S.W. 1029 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1905)