Allison v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Allison v. State

1924 OK CR 56, 223 P. 405, 26 Okla. Crim. 244, 1924 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 53

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 1, 1924

DocketNo. A-4992.

StatusPublished

This text of 1924 OK CR 56 (Allison v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allison v. State, 1924 OK CR 56, 223 P. 405, 26 Okla. Crim. 244, 1924 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 53 (Okla. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On tbe 23d day of September, 1923, tbe county attorney of-Adair county filed an information in tbe county court of said county charging Lee Allison with the crime of unlawful conveyance of whisky from a point unknown in said county to tbe town of Stillwell in said county. Trial was bad on the 16th day of November, 1923, resulting in a verdict of guilty, with punishment fixed as above stated. On tbe 17th day of November judgment was rendered in accordance with tbe verdict.

Motion for a new trial was filed and overruled, and tbe defendant prayed an appeal to this court; tbe court granting 45 days in which to make and serve case-made. Tbe case-made was served on tbe county attorney on tbe 7th day of January, 1924; suggestion of amendments to said case-made being waived, and consent given that the same might be signed and settled immediately, the trial judge on said 7th day of January, 1924, signed and settled the same in accordance with the statute.

*245 The petition in error and ease-made were not filed in tbis court until the 18th day of January, 1924, which was 62 days after rendition of the judgment. The trial court made no order extending the time for filing the appeal in this court beyond the 60 days after rendition of judgment allowed by the statute (section 2808, Compiled Statutes 1921) for taking appeals in misdemeanor cases. On February 5, 1924, the Attorney General filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, because the same was not filed within the time required by section 2808, Compiled Statutes 1921. No résponse has been made to said motion.

An examination of the record discloses that the motion of the Attorney General is well taken, and the appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On tbe 23d day of September, 1923, tbe county attorney of-Adair county filed an information in tbe county court of said county charging Lee Allison with the crime of unlawful conveyance of whisky from a point unknown in said county to tbe town of Stillwell in said county. Trial was bad on the 16th day of November, 1923, resulting in a verdict of guilty, with punishment fixed as above stated. On tbe 17th day of November judgment was rendered in accordance with tbe verdict.

Motion for a new trial was filed and overruled, and tbe defendant prayed an appeal to this court; tbe court granting 45 days in which to make and serve case-made. Tbe case-made was served on tbe county attorney on tbe 7th day of January, 1924; suggestion of amendments to said case-made being waived, and consent given that the same might be signed and settled immediately, the trial judge on said 7th day of January, 1924, signed and settled the same in accordance with the statute.

*245 The petition in error and ease-made were not filed in tbis court until the 18th day of January, 1924, which was 62 days after rendition of the judgment. The trial court made no order extending the time for filing the appeal in this court beyond the 60 days after rendition of judgment allowed by the statute (section 2808, Compiled Statutes 1921) for taking appeals in misdemeanor cases. On February 5, 1924, the Attorney General filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, because the same was not filed within the time required by section 2808, Compiled Statutes 1921. No résponse has been made to said motion.

An examination of the record discloses that the motion of the Attorney General is well taken, and the appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1924 OK CR 56, 223 P. 405, 26 Okla. Crim. 244, 1924 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 53, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allison-v-state-oklacrimapp-1924.