Allison v. State

652 So. 2d 472, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2971, 1995 WL 121525
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 23, 1995
DocketNo. 94-1515
StatusPublished

This text of 652 So. 2d 472 (Allison v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allison v. State, 652 So. 2d 472, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2971, 1995 WL 121525 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of his three and one-half year sentence imposed upon a guilty plea to dealing in stolen property on the ground that the lower court failed to make adequate findings to support imposition of adult sanctions. The record reflects that appellant, who was 17 years of age at the time the guilty plea was entered, had previously been treated as an adult. Therefore, any inadequacy with regard to the order imposing adult sanctions is irrelevant since such an order was not required under section 39.022(5)(d), Florida Statutes. See, Hangen v. State, 651 So.2d 706 (Fla. 5th DCA, 1995), and Varela v. State, 650 So.2d 683 (Fla. 5th DCA, 1995).

BOOTH, LAWRENCE and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hangen v. State
651 So. 2d 706 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Varela v. State
650 So. 2d 683 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
652 So. 2d 472, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2971, 1995 WL 121525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allison-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.