Allison v. Prack
982 N.E.2d 615, 20 N.Y.3d 982, 2012 NY Slip Op 93925, 958 N.Y.S.2d 695, 2012 WL 6579918, 2012 N.Y. LEXIS 3640
Opinion
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order of affirmance, dismissed as untimely (see CPLR 5513 [b]; Eaton v State of New York, 76 NY2d 824 [1990]); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying reargument, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Allison v. Prack, 982 N.E.2d 615, 20 N.Y.3d 982, 2012 NY Slip Op 93925, 958 N.Y.S.2d 695, 2012 WL 6579918, 2012 N.Y. LEXIS 3640 (N.Y. 2012).
982 N.E.2d 615 (Allison v. Prack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Eaton v. State
559 N.E.2d 675 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)