Allison v. Martin

604 F. App'x 309
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 27, 2015·No. No. 15-6155·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are' not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Marcus Daniel Allison appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Allison’s ' 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. Allison also appeals the district court’s subsequent text order denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Allison v. Martin, No. 1:14-cv-00668-RBH, 2014 WL -6647139 (D.S.C. Nov. 24, 2014; Dec. 19, 2014). We further deny Allison’s motion to appoint counsel and deny as unnecessary his motion for a certificate of appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allison v. Martin, 604 F. App'x 309 (4th Cir. 2015).

604 F. App'x 309 (Allison v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related