Allison v. Luedermann

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Allison v. Luedermann

100 N.Y.S. 1103

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedNovember 14, 1906

StatusPublished

This text of 100 N.Y.S. 1103 (Allison v. Luedermann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allison v. Luedermann, 100 N.Y.S. 1103 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There was sufficient evidence to warrant a conclusion that the engineer, [1104]*1104acting as defendant’s servant, in the scope of his employment and in the course of his work, cut the pipe, and thus caused the loss sustained by the plaintiff. There was evidence that 577 mirrors were damaged, which, undamaged, were of the value of $203.30; that some of these were cut up, and some resilvered, at a cost of $36.25; and that thereafter they were sold for $107.36. There was also evidence that the case goods were damaged $50. This evidence, under the circumstances, warrants a conclusion that the total loss was $182.19. This sum, with interest thereon from February 1, 1904, to the date of judgment, makes a total of $207.69. There was no evidence to warrant an allowance of more than this sum. The judgment will be modified accordingly, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

There was sufficient evidence to warrant a conclusion that the engineer, [1104]*1104acting as defendant’s servant, in the scope of his employment and in the course of his work, cut the pipe, and thus caused the loss sustained by the plaintiff. There was evidence that 577 mirrors were damaged, which, undamaged, were of the value of $203.30; that some of these were cut up, and some resilvered, at a cost of $36.25; and that thereafter they were sold for $107.36. There was also evidence that the case goods were damaged $50. This evidence, under the circumstances, warrants a conclusion that the total loss was $182.19. This sum, with interest thereon from February 1, 1904, to the date of judgment, makes a total of $207.69. There was no evidence to warrant an allowance of more than this sum. The judgment will be modified accordingly, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 N.Y.S. 1103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allison-v-luedermann-nyappterm-1906.