Allison v. Fitz Water Wheel Co.

95 A. 392, 250 Pa. 111
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 26, 1915·No. Appeal, No. 174·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The injuries sustained by the appellee were caused by the breaking of an iron hook in the foundry of his em[113] ployer. The negligence of the defendant was the fundamental question in the case, and could not have been taken from the jury, in view of the evidence of the crystallization of the hook, caused, according to the testimony of several witnesses, by its long use. Whether the defendant had been negligent in not testing or inspecting it from time to time was a matter for the jury. As we have not been convinced that any of the assignments of error, complaining of rulings on offers of evidence, ought to be sustained, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allison v. Fitz Water Wheel Co., 95 A. 392, 250 Pa. 111 (Pa. 1915).

95 A. 392 (Allison v. Fitz Water Wheel Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fullard v. Pittsburgh Urban Redevelopment Authority
293 A.2d 118 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1972)
Sullivan v. Baltimore & Ohio R. R.
116 A. 369 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1922)
McGrath v. Atlantic Refining Co.
107 A. 741 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1919)