Allison v. Fitz Water Wheel Co.
This text of 95 A. 392 (Allison v. Fitz Water Wheel Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The injuries sustained by the appellee were caused by the breaking of an iron hook in the foundry of his em[113]*113ployer. The negligence of the defendant was the fundamental question in the case, and could not have been taken from the jury, in view of the evidence of the crystallization of the hook, caused, according to the testimony of several witnesses, by its long use. Whether the defendant had been negligent in not testing or inspecting it from time to time was a matter for the jury. As we have not been convinced that any of the assignments of error, complaining of rulings on offers of evidence, ought to be sustained, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
95 A. 392, 250 Pa. 111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allison-v-fitz-water-wheel-co-pa-1915.