Allison v. Fitz Water Wheel Co.

95 A. 392, 250 Pa. 111
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 26, 1915
DocketAppeal, No. 174
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 95 A. 392 (Allison v. Fitz Water Wheel Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allison v. Fitz Water Wheel Co., 95 A. 392, 250 Pa. 111 (Pa. 1915).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The injuries sustained by the appellee were caused by the breaking of an iron hook in the foundry of his em[113]*113ployer. The negligence of the defendant was the fundamental question in the case, and could not have been taken from the jury, in view of the evidence of the crystallization of the hook, caused, according to the testimony of several witnesses, by its long use. Whether the defendant had been negligent in not testing or inspecting it from time to time was a matter for the jury. As we have not been convinced that any of the assignments of error, complaining of rulings on offers of evidence, ought to be sustained, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fullard v. Pittsburgh Urban Redevelopment Authority
293 A.2d 118 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1972)
Sullivan v. Baltimore & Ohio R. R.
116 A. 369 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1922)
McGrath v. Atlantic Refining Co.
107 A. 741 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 A. 392, 250 Pa. 111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allison-v-fitz-water-wheel-co-pa-1915.