Allison v. Delaware & Schuylkill Canal Co.
5 Whart. 482, 1840 Pa. LEXIS 241
Opinion
The exception to the appointment of viewers before the completion of the canal, is disposed of by the Commonwealth v. M‘Allister.
Such of the other exceptions as have been urged, depend on depositions, which we have determined, perhaps after some contrariety of decision in cases of this kind, to be inadmissible; and this ;.s to be taken for the established practice of the Court.
Proceedings affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Allison v. Delaware & Schuylkill Canal Co., 5 Whart. 482, 1840 Pa. LEXIS 241 (Pa. 1840).
5 Whart. 482 (Allison v. Delaware & Schuylkill Canal Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rimer's Contested Election. Geary's App'l.
175 A. 544 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1934)
Pennsylvania Railroad v. First German Lutheran Congregation
53 Pa. 445 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1867)
Patten v. Susquehanna Railroad
1 Pears. 48 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1854)
Overseers v. Brown
13 Pa. 389 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1850)
Pennsylvania Railroad v. Heister
8 Pa. 445 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1848)