Allison v. Clark County Detention Center

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedMay 23, 2022
Docket2:21-cv-01339
StatusUnknown

This text of Allison v. Clark County Detention Center (Allison v. Clark County Detention Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allison v. Clark County Detention Center, (D. Nev. 2022).

Opinion

3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6 RONALD J. ALLISON, Case No. 2:21-cv-01339-CDS-EJY

7 Plaintiff, Order Adopting Report and 8 v. Recommendation

9 CLARK COUNTY DETENTION CENTER,

10 Defendant.

11 12 Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate 13 Judge Elayna J. Youchah entered on September 22, 2021. ECF No. 8. 14 The R&R recommends that plaintiff’s action be dismissed without prejudice for 15 plaintiff’s failure to file the appropriate filing fee as directed by the Court on July 15, 2021. See 16 ECF No. 3 (order directing the plaintiff to either pay the appropriate filing fee for a civil action 17 or submit a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis). That same order warned the 18 plaintiff that failure to comply with the order would result in the dismissal of the case. Id. at 2-3. 19 The plaintiff was also ordered to update his address with the Clerk of Court pursuant to Local 20 Rule IA 3-1 or the action may be dismissed. See ECF No. 5. The plaintiff has failed to comply 21 with the instructions of the magistrate judge and failed to request more time to comply with the 22 instructions. The deadline for any party to object to that recommendation was October 6, 2021, 23 and no party filed anything or asked to extend the deadline to do so. “[N]o review is required of 24 1 a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.” 1 Accordingly, I 2 adopt the R&R and dismiss this action. 3 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and 4 Recommendation (ECF No. 8) is ADOPTED in its entirety. 5 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 6 The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 DATED this 23rd day of May, 2022.

11 CRISTINA D. SILVA 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

1 Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thomas v. Arn
474 U.S. 140 (Supreme Court, 1986)
Schmidt v. Johnstone
263 F. Supp. 2d 1219 (D. Arizona, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Allison v. Clark County Detention Center, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allison-v-clark-county-detention-center-nvd-2022.