Allison v. Allison

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Allison v. Allison

247 A.D. 910

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 247 A.D. 910 (Allison v. Allison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allison v. Allison, 247 A.D. 910 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for an absolute divorce in which plaintiff husband was awarded judgment after trial, order, as resettled, denying motion of the defendant wife for a reason[911]*911able allowance to be paid by plaintiff in connection with the defendant’s appeal from the interlocutory judgment, reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, to the extent of fixing an allowance in the sum of $750 for counsel fee and necessary disbursements to be paid by the plaintiff as provided in the order entered hereon, which is to be settled on notice. We are of opinion that the showing of the defendant upon said motion was sufficient to warrant the granting thereof. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for an absolute divorce in which plaintiff husband was awarded judgment after trial, order, as resettled, denying motion of the defendant wife for a reason[911]*911able allowance to be paid by plaintiff in connection with the defendant’s appeal from the interlocutory judgment, reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, to the extent of fixing an allowance in the sum of $750 for counsel fee and necessary disbursements to be paid by the plaintiff as provided in the order entered hereon, which is to be settled on notice. We are of opinion that the showing of the defendant upon said motion was sufficient to warrant the granting thereof. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

247 A.D. 910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allison-v-allison-nyappdiv-1936.