Allison T. Williams v. Raymond W. Anderson
This text of 361 F.2d 335 (Allison T. Williams v. Raymond W. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
The judgment of conviction of appellant in the Delaware Superior Court on its own particular facts is not in conflict with Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368, 84 S.Ct. 1774, 12 L.Ed.2d 908 (1964) or with Escobedo v. State of Illinois, 378 *336 U.S. 478, 84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L.Ed.2d 977 (1964), whether or not finally held retrospective in its application or with United States ex rel. Russo v. State of New Jersey, 351 F.2d 429 (3 Cir. 1965). In all other aspects the state trial was free from substantial error.
The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
361 F.2d 335, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 5959, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allison-t-williams-v-raymond-w-anderson-ca3-1966.