Allison T. Williams v. Raymond W. Anderson

Third Circuit

Allison T. Williams v. Raymond W. Anderson

361 F.2d 335, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 5959

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided June 1, 1966·No. 15755_1·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of conviction of appellant in the Delaware Superior Court on its own particular facts is not in conflict with Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368, 84 S.Ct. 1774, 12 L.Ed.2d 908 (1964) or with Escobedo v. State of Illinois, 378 *336 U.S. 478, 84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L.Ed.2d 977 (1964), whether or not finally held retrospective in its application or with United States ex rel. Russo v. State of New Jersey, 351 F.2d 429 (3 Cir. 1965). In all other aspects the state trial was free from substantial error.

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of conviction of appellant in the Delaware Superior Court on its own particular facts is not in conflict with Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368, 84 S.Ct. 1774, 12 L.Ed.2d 908 (1964) or with Escobedo v. State of Illinois, 378 *336 U.S. 478, 84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L.Ed.2d 977 (1964), whether or not finally held retrospective in its application or with United States ex rel. Russo v. State of New Jersey, 351 F.2d 429 (3 Cir. 1965). In all other aspects the state trial was free from substantial error.

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

Allison T. Williams v. Raymond W. Anderson, 361 F.2d 335, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 5959 (3d Cir. 1966).

Pincite

361 F.2d 335 (Allison T. Williams v. Raymond W. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related