Allison Chapman v. U.S. Bank, N.A., etc.
This text of 324 F. App'x 534 (Allison Chapman v. U.S. Bank, N.A., etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Allison Chapman appeals the district court’s 1 denial of her motion for reconsideration. We hold that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying reconsideration, because Chapman raised arguments that she could have raised in a timely appeal. See Sanders v. Clemco Indus., 862 F.2d 161, 169-70 (8th Cir.1988) (standard of review; court was not required to grant Rule 60(b) motion where it raised ground for relief that could have been raised in timely appeal). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
324 F. App'x 534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allison-chapman-v-us-bank-na-etc-ca8-2009.