Alligood v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Alligood v. State

287 S.E.2d 125, 160 Ga. App. 785, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 1686

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 5, 1982

Docket62551

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 287 S.E.2d 125 (Alligood v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alligood v. State, 287 S.E.2d 125, 160 Ga. App. 785, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 1686 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Pope, Judge.

Carlos D. Alligood was convicted of the offense of commercial gambling and sentenced to serve five years on probation provided he complied with eleven listed conditions. Probation was revoked on [786]*786grounds that he violated three of these conditions. Alligood appeals, contending the evidence was insufficient to authorize the revocation. “ ‘Where the trial judge finds slight evidence that the conditions of probation have been violated, he may through his discretionary power revoke the probation, and such action may not be overturned without a showing that there has been a manifest abuse of discretion. [Cit.]’ ” Hayes v. State, 157 Ga. App. 659 (1) (278 SE2d 424) (1981). The evidence here was sufficient to authorize revocation on any of the stated grounds.

Decided January 5, 1982. William Washington Larsen, Jr., for appellant. B. B. Hayes, District Attorney, William T. McBroom III, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, C. J., and McMurray, P. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pope, Judge.

Carlos D. Alligood was convicted of the offense of commercial gambling and sentenced to serve five years on probation provided he complied with eleven listed conditions. Probation was revoked on [786]*786grounds that he violated three of these conditions. Alligood appeals, contending the evidence was insufficient to authorize the revocation. “ ‘Where the trial judge finds slight evidence that the conditions of probation have been violated, he may through his discretionary power revoke the probation, and such action may not be overturned without a showing that there has been a manifest abuse of discretion. [Cit.]’ ” Hayes v. State, 157 Ga. App. 659 (1) (278 SE2d 424) (1981). The evidence here was sufficient to authorize revocation on any of the stated grounds.

Decided January 5, 1982. William Washington Larsen, Jr., for appellant. B. B. Hayes, District Attorney, William T. McBroom III, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, C. J., and McMurray, P. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

287 S.E.2d 125, 160 Ga. App. 785, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 1686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alligood-v-state-gactapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack