Alligood v. Seaboard Coastline Railroad

204 S.E.2d 706, 21 N.C. App. 419, 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 1820
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedMay 1, 1974
DocketNo. 742SC199
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 204 S.E.2d 706 (Alligood v. Seaboard Coastline Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alligood v. Seaboard Coastline Railroad, 204 S.E.2d 706, 21 N.C. App. 419, 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 1820 (N.C. Ct. App. 1974).

Opinion

CAMPBELL, Judge.

We have considered all the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff and hold that there was no error in the trial court’s granting the motion for directed verdict. As to the contributory negligence of the plaintiff driver, we hold that [421]*421this case falls within the exception to Cutts v. Casey, 278 N.C. 390, 180 S.E. 2d 297 (1971), as outlined in Wyche v. Alexander, 15 N.C. App. 130, 189 S.E. 2d 608 (1972), and Price v. Conley, filed in the Court of Appeals on 17 April 1974, in that the granting of a directed verdict for the party with the burden of proof is permissible when the only evidence was plaintiff’s own evidence and defendant’s burden is met for him by the plaintiff. Compare with Brown v. R. R. Co. and Phillips v. R. R. Co., 276 N.C. 398, 172 S.E. 2d 502 (1970).

Affirmed.

Judges Morris and Vaughn concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McLean v. Sale
284 S.E.2d 160 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
204 S.E.2d 706, 21 N.C. App. 419, 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 1820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alligood-v-seaboard-coastline-railroad-ncctapp-1974.