Allied Stores of New York, Inc. v. Finance Administrator of New York

76 A.D.2d 835, 428 N.Y.S.2d 316, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11880
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 2, 1980
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 76 A.D.2d 835 (Allied Stores of New York, Inc. v. Finance Administrator of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allied Stores of New York, Inc. v. Finance Administrator of New York, 76 A.D.2d 835, 428 N.Y.S.2d 316, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11880 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

In a consolidated tax certiorari proceeding, the parties cross-appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 18, 1978, which reduced the assessment on certain properties rented by petitioner under a net lease. Cross appeal by petitioner dismissed, without costs or disbursements. Said cross appeal was not properly perfected under the rules of this court. On appeal by the city appellants, judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. There was sufficient evidence in the record of the economic deterioration of Jamaica Avenue to warrant Special Term’s reduction of the assessment on certain properties rented by petitioner under a long-term net lease. However, it should be noted that petitioner’s method of arriving at fair rental value was improper. Instead of taking the subject premises and evaluating it as a department store which it unquestionably was for the period in question, petitioner’s experts evolved a novel method. They determined that the department store use was no longer viable during this period and evaluated the premises as if it were subdivided for small retail stores on the first floor and basement. They valued the rest of the building as storage or warehouse space. This is not permissible in a proceeding to reduce an assessment for a prior period. Should the subdivision ever occur then an application for further reduction would be appropriate. Titone, J. P., Mangano, Margett and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Estate of Goldman v. Commissioner of Finance
153 Misc. 2d 104 (New York Supreme Court, 1992)
Board of Assessment Appeals v. Colorado Arlberg Club
762 P.2d 146 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1988)
BCA-White Plains Lanes, Inc. v. Glaser
91 A.D.2d 633 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Weingarten v. Town of Ossining
85 A.D.2d 697 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Addis Co. v. Srogi
79 A.D.2d 856 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 A.D.2d 835, 428 N.Y.S.2d 316, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allied-stores-of-new-york-inc-v-finance-administrator-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1980.