Allied-Signal, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation

503 U.S. 928
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 11, 1992
DocketNo. 91-615
StatusPublished

This text of 503 U.S. 928 (Allied-Signal, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allied-Signal, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation, 503 U.S. 928 (1992).

Opinion

Sup. Ct. N. J. [Certiorari granted, 502 U. S. 977.] Case restored to calendar for reargument during the April session. The parties are requested to simultaneously file with the Clerk of this Court and serve upon the parties, on or before 3 p.m., Friday, April 10, 1992, supplemental briefs addressing the following questions:

“1. Should the Court overrule ASARCO Inc. v. Idaho State Tax Comm’n, 458 U. S. 307 (1982), and F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Taxation and Revenue Dept. of New Mexico, 458 U. S. 354 (1982)?
“2. If ASARCO and Woolworth were overruled, should the decision apply retroactively?
“3. If ASARCO and Woolworth were overruled, what constitutional principles should govern state taxation of corporations doing business in several states?”

Replies thereto, if any, are to be filed with the Clerk and served upon the parties on or before noon, Friday, April 17, 1992. The views of amici curiae are invited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

ASARCO Inc. v. Idaho State Tax Commission
458 U.S. 307 (Supreme Court, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
503 U.S. 928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allied-signal-inc-v-director-division-of-taxation-scotus-1992.