Allied-Signal, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation

Supreme Court

Allied-Signal, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation

503 U.S. 928

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 11, 1992·No. No. 91-615·Published

Opinion

Sup. Ct. N. J. [Certiorari granted, 502 U. S. 977.] Case restored to calendar for reargument during the April session. The parties are requested to simultaneously file with the Clerk of this Court and serve upon the parties, on or before 3 p.m., Friday, April 10, 1992, supplemental briefs addressing the following questions:

“1. Should the Court overrule ASARCO Inc. v. Idaho State Tax Comm’n, 458 U. S. 307 (1982), and F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Taxation and Revenue Dept. of New Mexico, 458 U. S. 354 (1982)?

“2. If ASARCO and Woolworth were overruled, should the decision apply retroactively?

“3. If ASARCO and Woolworth were overruled, what constitutional principles should govern state taxation of corporations doing business in several states?”

Replies thereto, if any, are to be filed with the Clerk and served upon the parties on or before noon, Friday, April 17, 1992. The views of amici curiae are invited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sup. Ct. N. J. [Certiorari granted, 502 U. S. 977.] Case restored to calendar for reargument during the April session. The parties are requested to simultaneously file with the Clerk of this Court and serve upon the parties, on or before 3 p.m., Friday, April 10, 1992, supplemental briefs addressing the following questions:

“1. Should the Court overrule ASARCO Inc. v. Idaho State Tax Comm’n, 458 U. S. 307 (1982), and F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Taxation and Revenue Dept. of New Mexico, 458 U. S. 354 (1982)?

“2. If ASARCO and Woolworth were overruled, should the decision apply retroactively?

“3. If ASARCO and Woolworth were overruled, what constitutional principles should govern state taxation of corporations doing business in several states?”

Replies thereto, if any, are to be filed with the Clerk and served upon the parties on or before noon, Friday, April 17, 1992. The views of amici curiae are invited.

Allied-Signal, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation, 503 U.S. 928 (1992).

Pincite

503 U.S. 928 (Allied-Signal, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related