Allied Premier Insurance v. United Financial Casualty Co.

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
• Decided: September 19, 2023
• Docket: 20-55099
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 19 2023 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALLIED PREMIER INSURANCE, a Risk No. 20-55099 Retention Group; a Connecticut corporation, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellee, 5:18-cv-00088-JGB-KK

v. MEMORANDUM* UNITED FINANCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY, an Ohio corporation,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Jesus G. Bernal, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 11, 2021 Submission Withdrawn March 22, 2021 Resubmitted September 19, 2023 Pasadena, California

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CALLAHAN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

United Financial Casualty Company appeals from the district court’s grant of

summary judgment to Allied Premier Insurance. Because the facts are known to the

parties, we repeat them only as necessary to explain our decision.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. The only issue on appeal is whether California’s Motor Carriers of Property

Permit Act (“MCPPA”), Cal. Veh. Code §§ 34600 et seq., continued the coverage

of United’s insurance policy with Porras after the policy otherwise ended by its own

terms. The district court relied on California precedent interpreting an earlier

version of the statute to determine that United’s policy continued through Porras’s

accident, and United was thus liable for equitable contribution to Allied. The district

court also entered judgment for Allied on its equitable subrogation and declaratory

relief claims. Mindful of the statutory changes since earlier California precedents,

we certified this state law question to the California Supreme Court. Allied Premier

Ins. v. United Fin. Cas. Co., 991 F.3d 1070 (9th Cir. 2021). Its answer decides this

appeal.

“The duration of the policy’s coverage is regulated by its terms and those of

any endorsement or amendment to the policy itself.” Allied Premier Ins. v. United

Fin. Cas. Co., 15 Cal. 5th 20, 39 (2023). United’s policy with Porras terminated

automatically when Porras did not renew the policy. The MCPPA did not extend its

duration. Id. at 34. (“[T]he Act does not prevent cancellation or termination of an

insurance policy under the terms of the contract.”).

United’s policy coverage terminated before Porras’s accident. Accordingly,

the district court’s summary judgment on Allied’s claims for equitable

contribution, equitable subrogation, and declaratory relief must be reversed.

2 REVERSED.