Allied Personnel, Inc. v. Williams

34 Fla. Supp. 139
CourtCircuit Court of the 4th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Duval County
DecidedOctober 5, 1970
DocketNo. 70-5008
StatusPublished

This text of 34 Fla. Supp. 139 (Allied Personnel, Inc. v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court of the 4th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Duval County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allied Personnel, Inc. v. Williams, 34 Fla. Supp. 139 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1970).

Opinion

GERALD B. TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge.

This action came on for hearing on defendant’s motion for dismissal. The defendant is a non-resident, living in the state of Alaska; and the summons and complaint were served upon him as provided in §48.161, Florida Statutes. Plaintiff contends that such service was appropriate because the cause of action set out in the complaint arises out of a transaction or operation connected with or incidental to a'business or business venture conducted by defendant in Florida within the meaning of §48.181, Florida Statutes.

For the purpose of disposing of this motion, the parties stipulated as follows —

(1) At no time material to this action was the defendant a resident of the state of Florida.
(2) When he signed the note attached to the complaint and the franchise agreement (incorporated in this record as defendant’s exhibit 1) for which the note was in payment, defendant was present in this state. His presence, however, was for a short vacation and was not brought about for the purpose of signing the note and agreement.
(3) The franchise territory awarded defendant under the agreement was restricted to Alaska, only. The performance of the agreement and the payment of the note did not require plaintiff’s presence in Florida.

The court concludes that a non-resident, who merely signs a note and contract in Florida and is not required to perform any obligation thereunder in this, state, is not engaging in a business or business venture within the purview of §48.181, and is not subject to substituted service of process, under §48.161, in a suit on such note. Accordingly, this action should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction over the person of the defendant.

It is, therefore, ordered that this action is dismissed without prejudice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 Fla. Supp. 139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allied-personnel-inc-v-williams-flacirct4duv-1970.