Allied MacHine & Engineering Corp. v. Competitive Carbide, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Allied MacHine & Engineering Corp. v. Competitive Carbide, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedAugust 9, 2012

Docket2012-1119

StatusUnpublished

This text of Allied MacHine & Engineering Corp. v. Competitive Carbide, Inc. (Allied MacHine & Engineering Corp. v. Competitive Carbide, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allied MacHine & Engineering Corp. v. Competitive Carbide, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

ALLIED MACHINE & ENGINEERING CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

COMPETITIVE CARBIDE, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________

2012-1119 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio in No. 10-CV-0773, Judge Christopher A. Boyko. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

R. ERIC GAUM, Hahn Loeser & Parks LLP, of Cleveland, Ohio, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were SCOTT M. OLDHAM and WILLIAM S. NABORS.

ROBERT W. MCINTYRE, McIntrye, Kahn & Kruse Co., L.P.A., of Cleveland, Ohio, argued for defendant-appellee. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and LOURIE, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

August 9, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI