ALLIED LEASING CORPORATION v. Murphy

233 S.E.2d 499, 141 Ga. App. 424, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1934
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 25, 1977·No. 53422·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Stolz, Judge.

An agreement, whereby a forty-acre tract of California real estate was sold with the guarantee that the sellers would resell the realty in one year for twice the plaintiffs purchase price, was a "security,” defined by the Georgia Securities Act of 1957, § l(i) (Ga. L. 1957, pp. 134, 136; Code Ann. § 97-102 (i)) as, inter alia, "any ... investment contract, . . . (or) beneficial interest in title to property, . . .” The above transaction falls within the framework of one or more, or a combination, of the four tests for the existence of securities recognized in Jaciewicki v. Gordarl Associates, 132 Ga. App. 888, 891 (209 SE2d 693) (1975).

Accordingly, the trial judge did not err in granting the plaintiff buyer’s motion for summary judgment in his action against the defendant sellers for damages for the sale of the above security, which was unregistered.

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, P. J., and Shulman, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ALLIED LEASING CORPORATION v. Murphy, 233 S.E.2d 499, 141 Ga. App. 424, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1934 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977).

233 S.E.2d 499 (ALLIED LEASING CORPORATION v. Murphy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1980
Opinion No.
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1980
D. K. Properties, Inc. v. Osborne
240 S.E.2d 293 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)