Allied Domecq Retailing USA v. Schultz

Sixth Circuit

Allied Domecq Retailing USA v. Schultz

50 F. App'x 279

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedNovember 5, 2002

DocketNo. 01-3572

StatusPublished

This text of 50 F. App'x 279 (Allied Domecq Retailing USA v. Schultz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allied Domecq Retailing USA v. Schultz, 50 F. App'x 279 (6th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

John Schultz, the debtor in this Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceeding, appeals from the order of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel affirming the Bankruptcy Court’s order denying his petition for discharge of his debts.

Having carefully considered the record on appeal, the briefs of the parties, and the [280]*280applicable law, we are not persuaded that the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel erred in affirming the order of the Bankruptcy Court.

Because the reasoning which supports the order has been articulated by the Bankruptcy Court, the issuance of a detailed written opinion by this court would be duplicative and serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, the order of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel is affirmed upon the reasoning employed by the Bankruptcy Court in its Memorandum of Opinion dated April 21, 2000.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

John Schultz, the debtor in this Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceeding, appeals from the order of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel affirming the Bankruptcy Court’s order denying his petition for discharge of his debts.

Having carefully considered the record on appeal, the briefs of the parties, and the [280]*280applicable law, we are not persuaded that the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel erred in affirming the order of the Bankruptcy Court.

Because the reasoning which supports the order has been articulated by the Bankruptcy Court, the issuance of a detailed written opinion by this court would be duplicative and serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, the order of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel is affirmed upon the reasoning employed by the Bankruptcy Court in its Memorandum of Opinion dated April 21, 2000.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 F. App'x 279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allied-domecq-retailing-usa-v-schultz-ca6-2002.