Allied Corp. v. McNamara

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Allied Corp. v. McNamara

539 So. 2d 636, 1989 La. LEXIS 669, 1989 WL 21187

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 10, 1989

DocketNo. 89-C-0182

StatusPublished

This text of 539 So. 2d 636 (Allied Corp. v. McNamara) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allied Corp. v. McNamara, 539 So. 2d 636, 1989 La. LEXIS 669, 1989 WL 21187 (La. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

In re McNamara, Shirley Secy.; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 87CA- 1370; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “K”, No. 293152.

Prior report: La.App., 536 So.2d 1290.

Writ granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeal is vacated. For the reasons discussed in Judge Shortess’ dissenting opinion to the Court of Appeal’s ruling, summary judgment is inappropriate. The case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re McNamara, Shirley Secy.; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 87CA- 1370; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “K”, No. 293152.

Prior report: La.App., 536 So.2d 1290.

Writ granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeal is vacated. For the reasons discussed in Judge Shortess’ dissenting opinion to the Court of Appeal’s ruling, summary judgment is inappropriate. The case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

539 So. 2d 636, 1989 La. LEXIS 669, 1989 WL 21187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allied-corp-v-mcnamara-la-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack