Allianz Insurance Co. v. Halpenny
678 So. 2d 368, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6310
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 12, 1996·No. Nos. 95-1365, 95-1722; Lower Tribunal No. 94-22451·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Because the insurer, Allianz Insurance Company, failed to comply with the annual notice requirements of section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1991),1 we find that the trial court properly held that the uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage is equal to the liability limits set forth in the policy. See Patterson v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., 564 So.2d 1149, 1152 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Ruiz v. Prudential Property & Casualty Ins. Co., 441 So.2d 681 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). Accordingly, we affirm the orders under review.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Allianz Insurance Co. v. Halpenny, 678 So. 2d 368, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6310 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
678 So. 2d 368 (Allianz Insurance Co. v. Halpenny) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Allianz Ins. Co. v. Halpenny
678 So. 2d 368 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)