Allianz Insurance Co. v. Halpenny
This text of 678 So. 2d 368 (Allianz Insurance Co. v. Halpenny) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Because the insurer, Allianz Insurance Company, failed to comply with the annual notice requirements of section 627.727(1), Florida Statutes (1991),1 we find that the trial court properly held that the uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage is equal to the liability limits set forth in the policy. See Patterson v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., 564 So.2d 1149, 1152 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Ruiz v. Prudential Property & Casualty Ins. Co., 441 So.2d 681 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). Accordingly, we affirm the orders under review.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
678 So. 2d 368, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allianz-insurance-co-v-halpenny-fladistctapp-1996.