Alliance Insurance v. Budlong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Alliance Insurance v. Budlong

258 A.D. 776, 14 N.Y.S.2d 829, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6839

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 4, 1939·Published

Opinion

Order affirmed, 'with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: The counterclaim alleges the technical requisites for an action in deceit. Anticipated difficulty in proving damages does not warrant our saying there are no damages. We, therefore, are of the opinion that the issues raised by the reply call for a determination at the Trial Term. All concur, except Taylor, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the ground that in his opinion there is no basis for damages. (The order denies plaintiff’s motion to strike out defendant’s answer and for summary judgment, in an action, on a contract.) Present — Sears, P. J., Lewis, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, 'with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: The counterclaim alleges the technical requisites for an action in deceit. Anticipated difficulty in proving damages does not warrant our saying there are no damages. We, therefore, are of the opinion that the issues raised by the reply call for a determination at the Trial Term. All concur, except Taylor, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the ground that in his opinion there is no basis for damages. (The order denies plaintiff’s motion to strike out defendant’s answer and for summary judgment, in an action, on a contract.) Present — Sears, P. J., Lewis, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Alliance Insurance v. Budlong, 258 A.D. 776, 14 N.Y.S.2d 829, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6839 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

258 A.D. 776 (Alliance Insurance v. Budlong) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.