Alliance Funding Co. of Nevada, Inc. v. Coward

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Alliance Funding Co. of Nevada, Inc. v. Coward

241 A.D.2d 532, 663 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8125

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 28, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 241 A.D.2d 532 (Alliance Funding Co. of Nevada, Inc. v. Coward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alliance Funding Co. of Nevada, Inc. v. Coward, 241 A.D.2d 532, 663 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8125 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Ne-ville Coward appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barasch, J.), dated February 22, 1996, which denied his motion, inter alia, to vacate a judgment entered upon his default in answering the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

To establish entitlement to vacatur of a judgment entered upon the movant’s default, the movant must demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense (see, Betancourth v Pacheco, 232 AD2d 442; Fennell v Mason, [533]*533204 AD2d 599; Putney v Pearlman, 203 AD2d 333). The appellant has failed to satisfy the standard in this case.

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Copertino, Pizzuto, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Ne-ville Coward appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barasch, J.), dated February 22, 1996, which denied his motion, inter alia, to vacate a judgment entered upon his default in answering the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

To establish entitlement to vacatur of a judgment entered upon the movant’s default, the movant must demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense (see, Betancourth v Pacheco, 232 AD2d 442; Fennell v Mason, [533]*533204 AD2d 599; Putney v Pearlman, 203 AD2d 333). The appellant has failed to satisfy the standard in this case.

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Copertino, Pizzuto, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

241 A.D.2d 532, 663 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alliance-funding-co-of-nevada-inc-v-coward-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack