Alliance Funding Co. of Nevada, Inc. v. Coward

241 A.D.2d 532, 663 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8125

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Ne-ville Coward appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barasch, J.), dated February 22, 1996, which denied his motion, inter alia, to vacate a judgment entered upon his default in answering the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

To establish entitlement to vacatur of a judgment entered upon the movant’s default, the movant must demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense (see, Betancourth v Pacheco, 232 AD2d 442; Fennell v Mason, [533]*533204 AD2d 599; Putney v Pearlman, 203 AD2d 333). The appellant has failed to satisfy the standard in this case.

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Copertino, Pizzuto, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alliance Funding Co. of Nevada, Inc. v. Coward, 241 A.D.2d 532, 663 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8125 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

241 A.D.2d 532 (Alliance Funding Co. of Nevada, Inc. v. Coward) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Putney v. Pearlman
203 A.D.2d 333 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Fennell v. Mason
204 A.D.2d 599 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Betancourth v. Pacheco
232 A.D.2d 442 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)