Alliance for Disabled in Action, Inc. v. Renaissance Enterprises, Inc.

886 A.2d 629, 185 N.J. 339, 2005 N.J. LEXIS 1483
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided December 1, 2005·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in written per curiam opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 371 N.J.Super. 409, 853 A.2d 334 (2004).

For affirmance—Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices LONG, LaVECCHIA, ZAZZALI, ALBIN, WALLACE, and RIVERA-SOTO—7.

Opposed—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alliance for Disabled in Action, Inc. v. Renaissance Enterprises, Inc., 886 A.2d 629, 185 N.J. 339, 2005 N.J. LEXIS 1483 (N.J. 2005).

886 A.2d 629 (Alliance for Disabled in Action, Inc. v. Renaissance Enterprises, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alliance v. RENAISSANCE ENTER.
886 A.2d 629 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2005)