Alliance for Community Media v. Federal Communications Commission

D.C. Circuit

Alliance for Community Media v. Federal Communications Commission

15 F.3d 186, 304 U.S. App. D.C. 367

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided February 16, 1994·No. No. 93-1169·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Respondents’ Suggestion For Rehearing In Banc and the response thereto have been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular, active service voted in favor of the suggestion. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED, by the Court in banc, that the suggestion is granted and these cases will be reheard by the court sitting in banc. It is

[187]*187FURTHER ORDERED, by the court in banc, that the judgment filed herein on November 23, 1993 be, 10 F.3d 812, and the , . . , J same hereby is, vacated.

A future order will govern further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Respondents’ Suggestion For Rehearing In Banc and the response thereto have been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular, active service voted in favor of the suggestion. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED, by the Court in banc, that the suggestion is granted and these cases will be reheard by the court sitting in banc. It is

[187]*187FURTHER ORDERED, by the court in banc, that the judgment filed herein on November 23, 1993 be, 10 F.3d 812, and the , . . , J same hereby is, vacated.

A future order will govern further proceedings.

Alliance for Community Media v. Federal Communications Commission, 15 F.3d 186, 304 U.S. App. D.C. 367 (D.C. Cir. 1994).

Pincite

15 F.3d 186 (Alliance for Community Media v. Federal Communications Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related