Alliance Casualty Co. v. Miele

249 A.D. 650, 291 N.Y.S. 433, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5394
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 30, 1936·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In an action by the insurance company to recover premiums, the defendants interposed counterclaims for legal services and for the amount paid in settlement of a suit when the plaintiff disclaimed liability under its indemnity policy and refused to defend. It was obligated under the terms of the policy to defend suits, whether groundless or not. It failed in its obligation to defend the claim either for workmen’s compensation or in the suit subsequently brought. It cannot now complain of the reasonable settlement made by the defendants in the suit. Judgment of the County Court of Nassau county unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Adel, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alliance Casualty Co. v. Miele, 249 A.D. 650, 291 N.Y.S. 433, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5394 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

249 A.D. 650 (Alliance Casualty Co. v. Miele) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cardinal v. State of New York
107 N.E.2d 569 (New York Court of Appeals, 1952)
Great American Indemnity Co. v. Audlane Realty Corp.
163 Misc. 301 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1937)