Alliance Brokerage Corp. v. Harry Weinberg & Sons, Inc.

16 A.D.2d 909, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9113

This text of 16 A.D.2d 909 (Alliance Brokerage Corp. v. Harry Weinberg & Sons, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alliance Brokerage Corp. v. Harry Weinberg & Sons, Inc., 16 A.D.2d 909, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9113 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Opinion

Order entered on September 15,1961, denying defendants’ motion for summary judgment and granting cross motion of plaintiff to strike out the defense of Statute of Frauds, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to plaintiff-respondent. On the present state of the pleadings the affirmative defense based on the Statute of Frauds was properly stricken. It may be, however, if the proof should vary from the complaint with respect to the oral agreement made for the payment of premiums, that defendants will be entitled to raise the defense either by way of amendment to its pleading or even without such amendment. (Fanger v. Caspary, 87 App. Div. 417; Anno. — Pleading Statute of Frauds, 158 A. L. R. 89, 134.) Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fanger v. Caspary
87 A.D. 417 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 A.D.2d 909, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alliance-brokerage-corp-v-harry-weinberg-sons-inc-nyappdiv-1962.